In chapter 3 I was intrigued by the conquering of Alexander
the Great but what really caught my attention in the reading was about the
comparison between the Roman and Chinese empires – mainly because they had
“little to no direct contact with eachother”. The Roman empire was set for
continuing to build new territories for their already large empire, and then
you take a look at china and they were driven solely on restoring the old, such
as building the Great Wall for not only protection but as a monument for the
emperor’s grave. Although they had different views on what to do with land they
conquered they both had one thing in common, and that was heavily relying on
their brutal military, which is what made the two empires so powerful and
resilient to battle. We see a much more centralized system in ruling towards different
level of social classes and the military’s authority. However in the end both
dynasty’s fell to an end.
I was most intrigued by how the Economy was for the Paleolithic people because their societies were made up of gathering and hunting, creating “goods” for them and it would only require a few hours of hard work where as the agricultural and industrial societies would take longer due to not really having a deadline. Gathering and hunting brought ends meet to those trying to survive, they not only did it to profit out of it but it was also a necessity for their personal lives – therefore it would be done in a shorter amount of time but it would require a lot more effort. With that being said people nowadays commit their lives to their industrial or agricultural job and spend most of their hours in a day at work, where as those of us that hunt only go for a few hours and call it a day whether we are able to find anything or not. As for gathering, that’s not even a thing nowadays thanks to grocery stores, so the most time invested in “gathering” nowadays is the produce section trying to...
Comments
Post a Comment