In chapter 3 I was intrigued by the conquering of Alexander
the Great but what really caught my attention in the reading was about the
comparison between the Roman and Chinese empires – mainly because they had
“little to no direct contact with eachother”. The Roman empire was set for
continuing to build new territories for their already large empire, and then
you take a look at china and they were driven solely on restoring the old, such
as building the Great Wall for not only protection but as a monument for the
emperor’s grave. Although they had different views on what to do with land they
conquered they both had one thing in common, and that was heavily relying on
their brutal military, which is what made the two empires so powerful and
resilient to battle. We see a much more centralized system in ruling towards different
level of social classes and the military’s authority. However in the end both
dynasty’s fell to an end.
I find it fascinating that one of the long distance trade routes was the Sahara...while riding a camel. With this road civilizations in the Mediterranean would be able to own North Africa goods, and vice versa. This route was well known have having merchants of gold but it's main trading good was salt, which the merchants would later be trekking their ways to the transshipment. Slowly caravans came into the picture but this was all to help trade expand further faster. Basically creating the first integrating system of "international commerce", it was no longer a domestic trade. Moving on to...Nomads. I knew what a nomad was, but I took them as innocent people just following the beat of their own drum or should I say animals, but learning they were aggressive and extorting China of its goods was definitely a shocker. Nomads thrive off of their livestock. They relied heavily on China's produced agricultural goods such as grains for their livestock. This led to noma...
Comments
Post a Comment